Core Sustainability Metrics: Your Anchor in Shifting Regulatory Tides
In a world of rapidly shifting sustainability reporting regulations, it can be difficult to know where to focus your efforts. But for companies serious about long-term resilience, anchoring your sustainability strategy in core, evergreen metrics is critical. By prioritising core metrics, you build a foundation that supports both compliance and long-term strategic impact.
Why Core Metrics Matter
Core metrics like emissions, employee diversity, and executive compensation aren’t just regulatory checkboxes, they’re strategic tools. They help you understand climate risk, stakeholder expectations, and the most material issues to your business and value chain.
These metrics inform better decision-making, strengthen credibility, and ensure your sustainability reporting remains relevant even as frameworks evolve.
Key Environmental Metrics to Track
-
Carbon Emissions (Scopes 1, 2 and 3)
- Scope 1 and 2: Direct operational emissions and those from purchased energy.
- Scope 3 (where possible): Indirect emissions across your value chain- suppliers, logistics, travel, downstream usage. Emissions remain the bedrock of any credible climate-strategy.
-
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Use
- Total energy consumption, energy intensity (per unit of output), and the share of renewables.
- Improving energy efficiency lowers cost and reduces carbon intensity.
-
Waste and Water Management
- Metrics on water withdrawal, consumption, recycling, and effluent discharge.
- Waste generation, recycling rates, landfill diversion, and circular-economy initiatives.
- Climate Risk Assessment.
Social and Governance Metrics That Always Count
-
Employee Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) and Well-being
- Representation by gender, ethnicity, role, and leadership.
- Metrics around pay equity, employee satisfaction, turnover, and well-being.
-
Corporate Governance and Ethics
- Board composition: diversity, independence, sustainability reporting competence.
- Executive compensation linked to sustainability reporting targets.
- Ethics policies, anti-corruption measures, whistleblower processes, and transparency.
-
Supply Chain Sustainability
- ESG assessments of suppliers, emissions embedded in the supply chain (Scope 3), and supplier diversity.
- Tracking supplier labour practices and codes of conduct helps mitigate risk and drive positive impact.
Materiality: Your North Star
Materiality assessments remain one of the most strategic exercises in sustainability reporting. By engaging stakeholders and evaluating sustainability reporting topics through the lens of impact materiality, financial materiality, or both (known as double materiality), you focus on what truly matters for your business and for society. The materiality assessment ensures your sustainability strategy and processes are aligned with both risk management and value creation.
Why These Metrics Are Future-Proof
- Regulation-agnostic insight: even if reporting standards change, these metrics drive internal strategy and stakeholder trust.
- Risk management: they help identify environmental, social, and governance risks early.
- Investor and stakeholder credibility: transparent, consistent metrics build trust.
- Strategic decision-making: core data points shape which sustainability initiatives to prioritise.
- Resilience: organisations with robust measurement practices are better equipped to adapt to new rules, investor demands, or market shifts.
How to Embed These Metrics in Your Reporting and Strategy
- Perform a materiality assessment: involve stakeholders; map financial and impact materiality.
- Set SMART KPIs for each core metric: emissions, energy use, water, waste, DEI, governance.
- Put data systems in place: measure, audit, and verify emissions (Scopes 1–3), energy, water, and more.
- Align metrics with strategy: integrate KPIs into your business planning, not just your annual report.
- Disclose transparently: report on core metrics in a clear, verifiable, stakeholder-friendly way.
- Review and update regularly: your material topics and priorities may shift, so reassess every few years.
Volkswagen Group: Double Materiality Assessment
Volkswagen uses a double materiality assessment in its sustainability reporting process. In its 2024 Annual Report, they describe a detailed double materiality assessment that:
- Evaluates impact materiality: how VW’s operations affect society and the environment; and
- Assesses financial materiality: how sustainability risks and opportunities (e.g. climate, biodiversity, regulatory change) affect VW’s business.
- Involves structured steps: context analysis, stakeholder mapping, workshops, validation by management, and use of ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards) topics.
- Results are reviewed annually and feed directly into VW’s sustainability reporting strategy and risk‑management processes.
By using double materiality, Volkswagen ensures that its sustainability strategy isn’t just about managing external impacts, but is deeply integrated into business value creation and risk management. This makes their sustainability reporting approach more robust, forward-looking, and aligned with regulatory standards.
In a shifting regulatory world, your core sustainability metrics including emissions, resource use, DEI, and governance are your anchors. They don’t just help you comply; they build trust, inform strategy, and ensure your sustainability reporting has real impact. Focus here first, and you'll be ready whatever the future holds.
Find out more about how to put these essentials into practice through our online training courses in the CSRD and VSME Standard.
Copyright © 2025